Classical Licks: J.S Bach and C.V Alkan

Here are the tabs corresponding to the "Bach and Alkan Licks" video I recently posted on YouTube. The contrast is noteworthy: on one hand you have the melodically generous offerings of Bach, and on the other you have whatever I could manage to play from Alkan! I'm quite surprised I could find anything playable in Alkan's 'Scherzo Focoso' Op. 34; the piece has a demonic drive but has a somewhat inflated reputation because of Ronald Smith's claims. The arpeggiated climax is action-packed but stretches on far too long for most (if not all) guitarists to handle.

The licks are presented in the same order as in the video!

If there are any questions about certain fingerings or picking patterns feel free to ask me on YouTube or at keithwhalen@gmail.com I don't always have the time (or patience) to plot all the individual fingerings.

Ulysses: Episode 17, Ithaca (an excerpt on astrological and biological inquiry)

He believed then that human life was infinitely perfectible, eliminating these conditions?


There remained the generic conditions imposed by natural, as distinct from human law, as integral parts of the human whole: the necessity of destruction to procure alimentary sustenance: the painful character of the ultimate functions of separate existence, the agonies of birth and death: the monotonous menstruation of simian and (particularly) human females extending from the age of puberty to the menopause: inevitable accidents at sea, in mines and factories: certain very painful maladies and their resultant surgical operations, innate lunacy and congenital criminality, decimating epidemics: catastrophic cataclysms which make terror the basis of human mentality: seismic upheavals the epicentres of which are located in densely populated regions: the fact of vital growth, through convulsions of metamorphosis, from infancy through maturity to decay.



Why did he desist from speculation?


Because it was a task for a superior intelligence to substitute other more acceptable phenomena in place of the less acceptable phenomena to be removed.



Did Stephan participate in his dejection?


He affirmed his significance as a conscious rational animal proceeding syllogistically from the known to the unknown and a conscious rational reagent between a micro and a macrocosm ineluctably constructed upon the incertitude of the void.



Was this affirmation apprehended by Bloom?


Not verbally. Substantially.



What comforted his misapprehension? 


That as a competent keyless citizen he had proceeded energetically from the unknown to the known through the incertitude of the void.



In what order of precedence, with what attendant ceremony was the exodus from the house of bondage to the wilderness of inhabitation effected?


Lighted Candle in Stick borne by

Bloom.

Diaconal Hat on Ashplant borne by

Stephen 



With what intonation secreto of what commemorative psalm?


The 113th, modus peregrinus: In exitu Israel de Egypto: domus Jacob de popula barbaro.



What did each do at the door of egress?


Bloom set the candlestick on the floor. Stephen put his hat on his head.



For what creature was the door of egress a door of ingress?


For a cat.



What spectacle confronted them when they, first the host, then the guest, emerged silently, doubly dark, from obscurity by a passage from the rere of the house into the penumbra of the garden?


The heaventree of stars hung with humid nightblue fruit.



With what meditations did Bloom accompany his demonstration to his companion of various constellations? 


Meditations of evolution increasingly vaster: of the moon invisible in incipient lunation, approaching perigee: of infinite lattiginus scintillating uncondensed milky way, discernible by daylight by an observer placed at the lower end of a cylindrical vertical shaft 5000 ft deep sunk from the surface towards the centre of the earth: of Sirius (alpha in Canis Major) 10 lightyears (57,000,000,000,000 miles) distant and in volume 900 times the dimension of our planet: of Arcturus: of the precession of equinoxes: of Orion with belt and sextuple sun theta and nebula in which 100 of our solar systems could be contained: of moribund and of nascent new stars such as Nova in 1901: of our system plunging towards the constellation of Hercules: of the parallax or parallactic drift of socalled fixed stars, in reality evermoving from immeasurably remote eons to infinitely remote futures in comparison with which the years, threescore and ten, of allotted human life formed a parenthesis of infinitesimal brevity.



Were these obverse meditations of involution increasingly less vast?


Of the eons of geological periods recorded in the stratification of the earth: of the myriad minute entomological organic existences concealed in cavities of the earth, beneath removable stones, in hives and mounds, of microbes, germs, bacteria, bacilli, spermatozoa: of the incalculable trillions of billions of millions of imperceptible molecules contained by cohesion of molecular affinity in a single pinhead: of the universe of human serum constellated with red and white bodies, themselves universes of void space constellated with other bodies, each, in continuity, its universe of divisible component bodies of which each was again divisible in divisions of redivisible component bodies, dividends and divisors ever diminishing without actual division till, if the progress were carried far enough, nought nowhere was never reached.



Why did he not elaborate these calculations to a more precise result?


Because some years previously in 1886 when occupied with the problem of the quadrature of the circle he had learned of the existence of a number computed to a relative degree of accuracy to be of such magnitude and of so many places, e.g., the 9th power of the 9th power of 9, that, the result having been obtained, 33 closely printed volumes of 1000 pages each of innumerable quires and reams of India paper would have had to be requisitioned in order to contain the complete tale of its printed integers of units, tens, hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, billions, the nucleus of the nebula of every digit of every series containing succinctly the potentiality of being raised to the utmost kinetic elaboration of any power of any of its powers.



Did he find the problem of the inhabitability of the planets and their satellites by a race, given in species, and of the possible social and moral redemption of said race by a redeemer, easier of solution?


Of a different order of difficulty. Conscious that the human organism, normally capable of sustaining an atmospheric pressure of 19 tons, when elevated to a considerable altitude in the terrestrial atmosphere suffered with arithmetical progression of intensity, according as the line of demarcation between troposphere and statosphere was approximated, from nasal hemorrhage, impeded respiration and vertigo, when proposing this problem for solution he had conjectured as a working hypothesis which could not be proved impossible that a more adaptable and differently anatomically constructed race of beings might subsist otherwise under Martian, Mercurial, Veneral, Jovian, Saturnian, Neptunian or Uranian sufficient and equivalent conditions, though an apogean humanity of beings created in varying forms with finite differences resulting similar to the whole and to one another would probably there as here remain inalterably and inalienably attached to vanities, to vanities of vanities and all that is vanity. 



And the problem of possible redemption?


The minor was proved by the major.



Which various features of the constellations were in turn considered?


The various colours significant of various degrees of vitality (white, yellow, crimson, vermillion, cinnabar): their degrees of brilliancy: their magnitudes revealed up to and including the 7th: their positions: the waggoner’s star: Walsingham way: the chariot of David: the annular cinctures of Saturn: the condensation of spiral nebulae into suns: the interdependent gyrations of double suns: the independent synchronous discoveries of Galileo, Simon Marius, Piazzi, Le Verrier, Herschel, Galle: the systematizations attempted by Bode and Kepler of cubes of distances and squares of times of revolution: the almost infinite compressibility of hirsute comets and their vast elliptical egressive and reentrant orbits from perihelion to aphelion: the sidereal origin of meteoric stones: the Libyan floods on Mars about the period of the birth of the younger astroscopist: the annual recurrence of meteoric showers about the period of the feast of S. Lawrence (martyr, 10 August): the monthly recurrence known as the new moon with the old moon in her arms: the posited influence of celestial on human bodies: the appearance of a star (1st magnitude) of exceeding brilliancy dominating by night and day (a new luminous sun generated by the collision and amalgamation in incandescence of two nonluminous exsuns) about the period of the birth of William Shakespeare over delta in the recumbent nerversetting constellation of Cassiopeia and of a star (2nd magnitude) of similar origin but lesser brilliancy which had appeared in and disappeared from the constellation of Corona Septentrionalis about the period of the birth of Leopold Bloom and of other stars of (presumably) similar origin which had (effectively or presumably) appeared in and disappeared from the constellations of Andromeda about the period of the birth of Stephen Daedalus, and in and from the constellation of Auriga some years after the birth and death of Rudolf Bloom, junior, and in and from other constellations some years before or after the birth or death of other persons; the attendant phenomena of eclipses, solar and lunar, from immersion to emersion, abatement of wind, transit of shadow, taciturnity of winged creatures, emergence of nocturnal or crepuscular animals, persistence of infernal light, obscurity of terrestrial waters, pallor of human beings.



His (Bloom’s) logical conclusion, having weighed the matter and allowing for possible error?


That it was not a heaventree, not a heavengrot, not a heavenbeast, not a heavenman. That it was a Utopia, there being no known method from the known to the unknown: an infinity, renderable equally finite by the suppositious probable apposition of one or more bodies equally of the same and of different magnitudes: a mobility of illusory forms immobilized in space, remobilized in air: a past which possibly had ceased to exist as a present before its future spectators had entered actual present existence.



Was he more convinced of the esthetic value of the spectacle?


Indubitably in consequence of the reiterated examples of poets in the delirium of the frenzy of attachment or in the abasement of rejection invoking ardent sympathetic constellations or the frigidity of the satellite of their planet.



Did he then accept as an article of belief the theory of astrological influences upon sublunary disasters?


It seemed to him as possible as proof as of confutation and the nomenclature employed in its selenographical charts as attributable to verifiable intuition as to fallacious analogy: the lake of dreams, the sea of rains, the gulf of dews, the ocean of fecundity.



What special affinities appeared to him to exist between the moon and woman?


Her antiquity in proceeding and surviving successive tellurian generations: her nocturnal predominance: her satellitic dependence: her luminary reflection: her constancy under all her phases, rising and setting by her appointed times, waxing and waning: the forced invariability of her aspect: her indeterminate response to inaffirmative interrogation: her potency over effluent and refluent waters: her power to enamour, to mortify, to invest with beauty, to render insane, to incite to and aid delinquency: the tranquil inscrutability of her visage: the terribility of her isolated dominant implacable resplendent propinquity: her omens of tempest and of calm: the stimulation of her light, her motion and her presence: the admonition of her craters, her arid seas, her silence: her splendour, when visible: her attraction, when invisible.

Blumenfeld - Etude Op. 3 No. 1

This is the etude that I ripped off for my 'Counterfeiting Blumenfeld' blog post, and I say that proudly. On top of being a revered conductor in his day, Felix Blumenfeld is recognized as Vladimir Horowitz' piano teacher also. I sometimes wonder if Horowitz knew any of his etudes, which I consider very beautifully written but can be very daunting. When trying to adapt the opening arpeggios for guitar, I had been practicing them on the piano as well. You definitely need quite the finger span to get these to sing at the required tempo, but as with most of Blumenfeld's etudes, the beauty is worth the duty! If only I had a bit more pianistic talent.

I highly recommend the channel under the username 'Hexameron', which is named after the collaborative variation set initially written in 1837 by Franz Liszt and thickened up with the help of Frederic Chopin, Sigismund Thalberg, Carl Czerny, Henri Herz and Johann Peter Pixis. The channel is filled with great piano compositions and encompasses many different styles and eras; most notably the era of the Russian musical repression (1900-1929). I urge you all to peruse that great channel!

Yuja Wang - Prokofiev Concerto No. 2 "Cadenza"

Here is an incredible clip of Yuja Wang playing the cadenza from Prokofiev's second piano concerto. I have a penchant for the grotesque when it comes to piano concertos and I've yet to hear anything more colossal than this cadenza. I've been stuck on this video for at least a week's time now, so I had no choice but to post it. The arpeggios at 3:05 are just killer and although they escape the highest register of a 24 fret guitar I'm trying to transcribe the section. At worst I will attempt to use the progression and capture the spirit while staying in the boundaries of the instrument. Check out the Horacio Gutierrez audio recording as well, as it's considered among the best for the Op. 16 concerto.

Sweep Examples